Cycling: US government backs $90m Armstrong suit
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The US government last night joined a lawsuit against Lance Armstrong that could see the disgraced cyclist and others named in the suit having to pay out $90m (£59m).
The whistleblower lawsuit was originally filed by Floyd Landis, a former team-mate of Armstrong’s and a fellow doper, alleging that Armstrong and others involved on the team defrauded the US government by accepting sponsorship from the US Postal Service, a federally funded body, while conducting widespread doping within the team.
Under US law an individual can take legal action for alleged fraud against the government and be entitled to up to a third of any monies awarded. The government’s decision to join the suit is a significant move and potentially a huge blow to Armstrong, who this week confirmed he would not co-operate with US anti-doping authorities.
Landis was stripped of the 2006 Tour de France title for doping and gave crucial evidence of Armstrong’s doping to the Usada investigation that finally exposed the seven-times Tour winner last year. The US government’s decision also follows Armstrong’s confession to Oprah Winfrey last month.
If Armstrong is judged to have broken the False Claims Act – with the sponsorship money handed out on the understanding that no doping was involved – he and the then team owner, Thomas Weisel, and his agent, Bill Stapleton, could have to pay out up to three times the $30m sponsorship given by US Postal between 1999 and 2004.
Armstrong has already been the subject of a federal grand jury inves-tigation that was dropped without a charge being made a year ago. He is facing civil lawsuits from a Texan promotions company and the Sunday Times that could cost him over $13m (£8.5m).
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments