Cycling: Sir Dave Brailsford hits out at doping innuendo aimed at Team Sky
The team manager said he respected the right of journalists and experts to ask legitimate questions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Dave Brailsford has attacked the whisperers who continue to suggest his Team Sky are guilty of doping.
The team manager said he respected the right of journalists and experts to ask legitimate questions about Sky's operations, such as the decision to hire Dr Geert Leinders in 2010 despite allegations of his past involvement in doping, but added that he was growing tired of online "innuendo" concerning his and his team's integrity.
"The Leinders question is legitimate, and when we do things there are legitimate questions that should be asked. We want them to be asked and we're more than happy to answer them. But I don't like innuendo. That's unfair," he told Cyclingnews.
Brailsford said it had been a mistake to hire Leinders, who left Sky last October, but angrily rejected the notion that the Belgian doctor's presence in the team was somehow proof that Sky were guilty of doping. "Of course it was a mistake. Absolutely. But hiring one doctor, who worked for 40 days, does that mean we're doping now? How does that work?" he said.
He added that his long and prestigious record of service with British Cycling, including overseeing the eight gold medals won at last year's Olympics, proved that he was not involved with doping.
"If you're a cheat, you're a cheat, you're not half a cheat, "Brailsford said. "You wouldn't say, 'I'll cheat here but I'm not going to cheat over there; I'll cheat on a Monday but not on a Tuesday.'
"So we were doping in the Olympics too? If I'm a doper, if I'm a liar, I'm a liar in my personality through and through. So why didn't I dope the Olympic team for the last 15 years? Have I just decided I'm going to do it with this team? I'm not going to do it over there but I'll cheat here? We've dominated the Olympic Games for 15 years. Explain that to me. We didn't just win at the Olympic Games, we dominated them, we smashed it out of the park. More than anyone else has ever done. That level of performance is monumental.
"If I'm a liar and a cheat and if my ethics and morals are all about cheating, if that's what we're doing here, surely I'll be doing it in other places in my life. Not just parts."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments