Boxing: Scoring system under fire

Steve Bunce
Tuesday 19 August 2003 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Jimmy Vincent may now get a chance at revenge after losing one of the most controversial decisions ever seen in a British ring.

The Birmingham boxer lost on points in a British welterweight title fight at Goresbrook Leisure Centre, Dagenham, last month against Manchester's David Barnes and few people could believe the result.

There was outrage at ringside because Vincent appeared to have won nine or 10 of the 12 rounds, yet the referee, John Keane, raised Barnes' hand and set in motion a series of events that finally persuaded the British Boxing Board of Control to make Vincent the mandatory challenger for the title.

Part of the controversy surrounds the ancient ritual that British boxing maintains, involving referees only scoring fights. It is possible that the British board will at some point in the future start using three judges at ringside like the rest of the world.

"In an ideal world three officials would sit at ringside and never get it wrong," the promoter, Frank Warren, said. "The board have not ordered an immediate rematch, they have made Vincent the mandatory challenger and David's first defence will not be against him. I will sit down with David and we will look at all options."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in