Lord Coe: IAAF president cleared of 'misleading' MPs over doping in sport
The IAAF ethics board have cleared Coe of any impropriety with regard to evidence he gave to a Parliamentary Committee
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Lord Coe has been cleared by the IAAF ethics board of any impropriety with regard to evidence he gave to a Parliamentary Committee concerning Russian doping in December 2015.
Coe, the IAAF president, had been accused in a report issued by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) committee of providing "misleading" answers, based around his claim that he had been unaware of the extent of a then-alleged extortion scheme concerning the Russian marathon runner Liliya Shobukhova.
Over two years later, in January 2017, David Bedford, the former race director of the London Marathon, also gave evidence to the committee, indicating he had emailed details of the Shobukhova case to former MP Coe, contained in a series of attachments, in August 2014.
The ethics board accepted Coe's evidence that his personal assistant had read the body of the emails, rather than the attachments, to him, and that by inference, he had been truthful in stating to the DCMS committee that he had no extensive knowledge of the Shobukova case at the time.
In a statement, the IAAF ethics board said it "did not find any evidence inconsistent with that position," and that Coe properly informed the Ethics Board's chairman, Michael Beloff, as soon as he became aware of the extent of the allegations.
The statement continued: "The investigation has therefore not identified evidence of a potential breach of the Code of Ethics by Lord Coe.
"The investigator concluded that there is no realistic prospect of establishing that Lord Coe knew more about the Shobukhova affair at the relevant time than that Liliya Shobukhova had made a complaint, and the complaint was serious.
"As such, the investigator concluded that there is no evidence such that there is any realistic prospect that any disciplinary case could be established that Lord Coe intentionally misled the Parliamentary Committee, and accordingly the investigator recommended against disciplinary charges being laid."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments