Athletics: Young ban wrong, says Johnson

Gene Cherry
Wednesday 30 June 2004 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) does not have a "legitimate case" in ruling that Jerome Young, the world 400 metres champion, should have been banned from the 2000 Sydney Olympics, according to the five-times Olympic champion Michael Johnson.

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) does not have a "legitimate case" in ruling that Jerome Young, the world 400 metres champion, should have been banned from the 2000 Sydney Olympics, according to the five-times Olympic champion Michael Johnson.

Johnson said he did not know how he would react should the International Olympic Committee (IOC) or International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) attempt to strip the US 4x400m relay team of their gold medals from the Games.

Young, who tested positive for the banned steroid nandrolone in 1999, ran in preliminary rounds of the relay at Sydney, putting in jeopardy the last gold medal won by Johnson, the world record-holder at 200m and 400m. "I never felt it was going to happen because I felt there was no legitimate case for them to do that,"Johnson said when asked about the possibility of losing the medal.

Johnson said he felt Young had been cleared to run in Sydney by a USA Track & Field (USATF) doping appeals board.

The board exonerated Young of the positive test after a US hearing panel had found him guilty. "No one else cared to look into it, not the IOC, not the IAAF. They accepted the USATF decision," he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in