AOC to test legality of neck-to-ankle swimsuits

Ap
Monday 20 March 2000 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Australian Olympic Committee will test the legality of neck-to-ankle swimsuits in the Court of Arbitration for Sport, with or without the support of FINA, swimming's world governing body.

AOC president John Coates has said swimmers who win Olympic medals while wearing the bodysuits could be exposing themselves to legal challenges by rivals who do not.

The neck-to-knee swimsuits have been sanctioned by FINA but Coates said legal challenges at the Olympics would be referred to the CAS, an international arbiter, where the interpretation of what equipment was legal or illegal could be defined differently.

AOC secretary-general Craig McLatchey on Tuesday said FINA did not want to participate in the test case, which is expected to go ahead before the Australian Olympic swimming trials in May.

"(FINA) are not prepared to participate in the advisory opinion ... they're satisfied that they have their rules and appropriate procedures and I understand that view but it probably doesn't go quite far enough," he said.

McLatchey said the AOC was not challenging the FINA regulations but was trying to ensure the rules were being applied to the letter of the law.

"It would be terrible if it were found that a suit ... were to have breached the FINA rules and the result of the athlete was set aside," he told Australian Associated Press.

McLatchey said the AOC action was a preventative measure.

"The question we're asking is not whether 10 or 800 athletes will wear the suit, it's simply saying 'how do we ensure that if our athletes wear the suit they won't be vulnerable to a challenge at CAS by an athlete who didn't wear the suit'," he said.

After the launch of a bodysuit by Australian Olympic sponsor, Speedo, in Athens, Greece, last week, FINA released a statement saying bodysuits are not "devices" designed to make swimmers go faster, such as webbed gloves, flippers or fins that violate FINA rules.

"It is up to each national Olympic committee or national federation to decide the equipment such as swimwear, track suits or other uniforms their athletes will wear at Olympic Games or World Championships," the statement said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in