England fans appear to update referee’s Wikipedia after World Cup loss
Wilton Sampaio drew the ire of many England fans after decisions he made in the quarter-final with France
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Wikipedia appears to have been edited by England fans upset by decisions made by referee Wilton Sampaio in the first half of the World Cup quarter-final.
The Brazilian referee drew the ire of England supporters after significant decisions in the first half of the game against France, with a possible foul in the build up to the French opener and a possible penalty shout eventually waved away after a lengthy VAR review.
Members of the public can edit the online encyclopaedia and in changes to Mr Sampaio’s Wikipedia page which were later taken down he was described as “a Brazilian cheat”.
Another edit stated that Mr Sampaio had “lost his guide dog”.
“Please return dog if found, the dog has a match to ref,” the Wikipedia page read.
Among those criticising Mr Sampaio’s decisions was former England right-back Gary Neville, who said a challenge by Dayot Upamecano on Arsenal’s Bukayo Saka in the build-up to France’s first goal should have been given as a free kick.
“It’s not excuses… but Upamecano has tried to win the game on three or four occasions where it’s impossible to win the ball,” he said on ITV1’s coverage.
“It’s a simple decision, he just kicked his leg away and I’m not sure why it’s not ended up as a foul.
“He’s nibbling and he’s kicked him and it should be a free kick.”
Fellow former England international Ian Wright added: “It is very difficult to see that not given, especially in the current climate what they give fouls for.”
Former England footballer and broadcaster Gary Lineker tweeted: “One of these days, just once, we might get a decision in our favour.”
England later equalised after the referee awarded them a penalty, converted by Harry Kane.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments