Liverpool pulled out of Dani Alves deal in favour of signing Jermaine Pennant, reveals former CEO
The Brazilian ended up leaving Sevilla for Barcelona instead and is set to join Manchester City this summer
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Liverpool had a deal agreed for former Barcelona and current Juventus right-back Dani Alves, before pulling out of the move and opting to sign Jermaine Pennant and Peter Crouch instead.
Alves is understood to be moving to Manchester City this summer to solve Pep Guardiola’s full-back issues, but former Liverpool CEO Rick Parry has revealed that he could have been in the Premier League 10 years earlier.
Rafa Benitez was in charge at the time and was keen to sign the Brazilian from Sevilla but the transfer failed to come to fruition after the club decided to spend the money on two players rather than just one.
He told BBC Radio Merseyside: “We had the deal - finally, after enormous complications - tied up for Dani Alves and then the decision was should we buy two players or should we spend all of that on a full-back?
“Alves was not the player then that he is now, but he always looked like he would be a great player.
“Would he have been a better signing than [Jermaine] Pennant and [Peter] Crouch, for example? Probably yes, but it's easy with hindsight.”
He also explained that the Reds came to the decision as a result of holding far less financial clout in the transfer market than the likes of Chelsea and Manchester United and felt they needed to buy quantity over quality.
He added: “Looking back, if I could do anything different, it would be to focus on buying one [player] at a time rather than having to buy five or six every season.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments