Steve Parish says ‘greatest enemy’ Uefa creating a Super League ‘by stealth’
The Crystal Palace chairman criticised European football’s governing body at the Financial Times Business of Football Summit
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Crystal Palace chairman Steve Parish says Uefa is “the greatest enemy of domestic leagues that exists” and is busy creating a Super League “by stealth”.
Parish has criticised the way European football’s governing body distributes money to teams involved in its competitions – and those outside them – and says it is impossible to tell the difference between Uefa’s plans for a revamped Champions League and the Super League which created such outrage last year.
The new-look Champions League, set to begin in 2024-25, is controversially set to reserve two places for clubs based on historic coefficient rather than league position in the previous campaign.
The expanded competition – poised to feature 10 group stage matches per club instead of the current six – also places pressure on the very existence of domestic cups which provide revenue for clubs not involved in Europe. Parish suggested Uefa president Aleksander Ceferin was “picking the pockets” of these clubs.
“To hear Mr Ceferin paint Uefa as the saviour of football and the supporter of fans was quite incredible,” Parish said at the Financial Times Business of Football Summit.
“If you asked pretty much every football club in Europe outside of the gilded 20 that are in the European Club Association, most people would tell you that Uefa is the greatest enemy to domestic leagues that exists.”
Asked if he subscribed to that view, Parish said: “Totally. You’ve got a completely opaque ExCo (executive committee).
“You’ve got the ECA, which is 20 clubs who decide everything. The new Champions League proposals look so much like the Super League, you can’t tell the difference. In fact in some regards they’re worse.
“There’s probably one thing that (Super League backers) Mr (Andrea) Agnelli, Mr (Joan) Laporta and I can agree on – that clubs should run tournaments and the governing body of the game should govern the game.
“Whilst we’ve got this interlocking with Fifa, Uefa– the people that are basically in charge – fighting domestic leagues over the calendar and there’s nobody over the top of it to govern that, to regulate it, then we’re in trouble, and we seem to be sleepwalking into it while Mr Ceferin picks all our pockets frankly.
“He uses the Super League as this nasty, terrible thing that he managed to stop when he was part of backing, and making something happen, with coefficients – with 40 per cent of the money (awarded to clubs) being decided on the last five years of history, he was already pulling the drawbridge up.
“He’s trying to get two more places to people that he thinks will provide the most media revenue in any given year. All of these competitions have an element of being gerrymandered in a way that only certain clubs ever take apart.
“At least with the Super League, they didn’t try and hide it. With Uefa, and the Champions League, what’s happening is happening by stealth.
“I think we urgently need change. And both organisations (Fifa and Uefa) need some oversight and scrutiny on this because they don’t have it. And it’s a big problem.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments