Rangers handed £6,000 fine for publicly criticising referee for St Mirren performance
Rangers lodged a complaint against Willie Collum and publicly criticised the referee
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Rangers have been fined a total of £6,000 over their criticism of referee Willie Collum.
The club were found to have breached two Scottish Football Association disciplinary rules following a Hampden hearing. Another two charges were not proven and a fifth was withdrawn.
Rangers lodged a formal complaint against Collum and publicly criticised him after failing to overturn a second yellow card for Daniel Candeias following a victory over St Mirren last month.
Rangers received a £5,000 fine for criticising a match official in such a way as to indicate bias or incompetence, or make remarks which impinge on his character. The rest of the punishment was for not acting in the "best interests of association football".
The other charges related to bringing the game into disrepute and sportsmanship and acting towards the SFA with good faith.
Rangers submitted an appeal against the yellow card after their win in Paisley on November 3 under one of the two premises allowed - that of mistaken identity - after Candeias appeared to do nothing untoward during a clash with Anton Ferdinand.
After losing their case, Rangers stated it "defied belief" that Collum had been handed one of the biggest matches in Scottish football that weekend - Aberdeen versus Hibernian - while Candeias was suspended.
An official statement added: "Furthermore, it is understood that a number of people within the Scottish FA are in no doubt Mr Collum's judgement was flawed and Rangers shall also now be submitting a formal complaint about the performance of this referee.
"The manner in which he reacted to an incident involving our player made it obvious he did not give due consideration to his decision.
"This is by no means the first time errors of judgement have been made in matches involving this official and clearly there is an underlying issue which requires to be addressed."
It later emerged that Candeias had been booked partly for "making gestures" towards the St Mirren defender seconds earlier after his side scored to make it 2-0.
Rangers confirmed soon after the written reasons for their appeal failure were published that they had issued a formal complaint against Collum.
PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments