Wolves boss Nuno Espirito Santo charged by FA for comments about referee Lee Mason
The Portuguese was highly critical of the official after his side's Premier League match against Burnley on 21 December
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Wolves manager Nuno Espirito Santo has been charged with improper conduct by the Football Association over comments he made about referee Lee Mason.
The Portuguese was highly critical of the official after his side's Premier League match against Burnley on 21 December.
The FA said in a statement: "Nuno Espirito Santo has been charged with a breach of FA Rule E3 in relation to their Premier League match against Burnley FC on Monday December 21, 2020.
"It is alleged that comments made by the head coach during a post-match interview constitute improper conduct as they were personally offensive to the match official and/or bring the game into disrepute contrary to FA Rule E3.1."
Nuno has until 5 January to respond to the charge, the FA said.
The Wolves boss said about Mason after the match: "The referee does not have the quality to whistle a game in the Premier League.
"It is not about the crucial mistakes or decisions, it is about the way he handles the game. The players get nervous, too much voices, he whistles by the voices when some players are shouting.
"We are talking about the best competition and clearly he doesn't have the quality to whistle the game. I'm very disappointed to say this but I would not feel right if I didn't say it.
"I just don't want to see him more - that's what I told him. I hope he doesn't whistle a game of ours again because all the games we have with Lee Mason are always the same.
"He cannot control the players, the players are constantly arguing - both teams. With all the other referees the game flows, there's dialogue. He's just not ready to do it."
On 23 December, Nuno said he would be discussing the matter with the FA on December 29 and that he would only apologise for the timing of his comments.
Nuno said: "They were not in the best moment to come across because it could be a bad interpretation.
"For that I will apologise on my timing, but I won't apologise for my words and thoughts.
"I never ever will judge or question the integrity of a referee. I never did it and I will never do it in my life.
"What I said is about the ability of the referee, what I felt and what I saw in the match and previous matches."
Post-match comments about a referee's performance are permitted under FA regulations provided they do not imply bias, attack an official's integrity, are not personally offensive, prolonged or particularly unreasonable.
PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments