United board unlikely to recommend Glazer's revised bid
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Manchester United's board is unlikely to recommend a revised bid for the club by Malcolm Glazer to shareholders. A formal decision is expected after the weekend but it seems the board will opt for a "third way" stance of neither backing nor rejecting a 300p per share offer, leaving shareholders to make up their own minds instead.
Manchester United's board is unlikely to recommend a revised bid for the club by Malcolm Glazer to shareholders. A formal decision is expected after the weekend but it seems the board will opt for a "third way" stance of neither backing nor rejecting a 300p per share offer, leaving shareholders to make up their own minds instead.
The board has previously said it considers Glazer's offer fair but it is unlikely to recommend it to shareholders because it will leave the club too heavily indebted. Nothing substantial about the funding has changed in Glazer's approach.
United's fate in the face of Glazer's approach has rested on whether the club's major stakeholders, John Magnier and JP McManus, will sell their 29 per cent holding, owned via their Cubic Expression company, to the American. That remains the case. But if the board effectively absolves itself of a guiding decision, the responsibility for United's future ownership will weigh heavier on the Irish racing tycoons than ever.
Glazer must now try how to persuade the Irish to sell, although he has yet to make any direct approach to them. Cubic have never commented publicly on their intentions, saying only that they are happy to be "long-term investors". However, sources in Ireland familiar with their thinking, say they are unlikely to find 300p per share attractive, having rejected a private offer at that price last year.
A further complication for Glazer could be the attitude of JP Morgan and other bankers - who would lend some £500m of an £800m offer - to a bid not supported by the board.
Glazer's backers have made it clear they are unlikely to support a hostile bid. If the board veer from neutrality to outright rejection, Glazer's ambitions will be stymied further, or more likely, ended.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments