Scudamore defends League's big spending
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In a typically bullish defence of his organisation the Premier League's chief executive, Richard Scudamore, told the Department for Culture Media and Sport (DCMS) that Chelsea's £72m spend on transfer deadline day would be applauded in other spheres of enterprise.
Responding to questions from DCMS as to whether there was too much debt in the professional game, and if Government intervention was justified, he said: "If this was any other industry where a Russian was bringing in £100m that then got re-cycled around we would be going, 'Oh, this is good investment'. Inward investment is generally encouraged."
Scudamore denied the £50m Chelsea paid for Fernando Torres was "ridiculous" and said he envisaged a time when a club would pay £100m for player.
Scudamore said the clubs had "survived the continuing economic turbulence reasonably well" adding, "income has increased, mainly due to the strong interest in the Premier League in overseas markets."
Government intervention, said Scudamore, was unnecessary as elite-level English football did not need public money.
Scudamore's defence came on the day Chelsea filed their accounts for the year ending June 2010, which revealed their wage bill soared to £172.5m, 82 per cent of turnover. This was almost £40m more than the next highest payers, Manchester City.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments