Publication of World Cup report blocked by right to anonymity for witnesses
Report into corruption will not be made public
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Fifa’s report into possible corruption in the bidding process for the 2018 and 2022 World Cups will not be made public because it is “not legally possible” to publish it in full.
Hans-Joachim Eckert, the German judge who has received the report and is currently producing a summary of it which will be made public next month, has said that not even a redacted version can be made public, because those interviewed for the report had been assured of anonymity.
“Publishing the report in full would actually put the Fifa ethics committee and Fifa itself in a very difficult situation legally,” he said. “What is more, we have to respect the personal rights of the people mentioned in the report, which in the case of full publication of the report would in all likelihood not be possible.”
Since the New York lawyer Michael Garcia, who is head of the investigatory arm of Fifa’s Ethics Committee, handed the report to Judge Eckert, head of the adjudicatory arm, there have been many calls for the report’s publication.
Garcia reiterated his call for more transparency in a speech in London earlier this week though in response to various reports, Eckert clarified: “Michael Garcia has never said that the report should be 100 per cent published.”
However, those wanting to see the full report will have to make do with next month’s summary which, Eckert explained, “will contain an overview of the investigation report, a summary of the main findings, conclusions and recommendations of the report, as well as a brief evaluation of the same.” Eckert warned Fifa in September that “many won’t like what I am going to tell them”.
If Eckert makes clear that the report contains clear evidence of corruption, it will be up to Fifa’s Executive Committee, not its Ethics Committee, to take any action but even they will not see the report in full.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments