Project Big Picture plans ‘laced with bribes’ to EFL, claims MP Ian Mearns

Ian Mearns MP, chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Football Supporters, branded the proposal fronted by Manchester United and Liverpool as a ‘disgrace’

Jamie Gardner
Thursday 22 October 2020 09:33 EDT
Comments
Premier League rejects Project Big Picture

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Project Big Picture proposals were "laced with bribes" to EFL clubs, according to an MP who has called for a parliamentary debate about the future of football.

The proposals for a dramatic reshaping of English football became public knowledge on 11 October but within three days had been formally rejected by the Premier League.

PBP had been developed by Liverpool and Manchester United and was criticised as an attempted 'power grab' by the Premier League's big six clubs.

However, they were publicly endorsed by EFL chairman Rick Parry because they included an immediate £250m rescue package for his clubs and a 25 per cent share of future broadcast revenues for the Premier League.

Ian Mearns, the Labour MP for Gateshead and chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Football Supporters, said in the House of Commons on Thursday: "Last week we saw England's six richest clubs put forward a disgraceful proposal to restructure the league laced with bribes to EFL clubs, many of which are in extreme financial duress, in order to secure their agreement.

"Thankfully these proposals were rejected, but the hares are running. So can we have a statement from the Secretary of State for DCMS and a debate in Government time about the future of our national game, which is in the heart of millions in our country?"

Jacob Rees-Mogg responded on behalf of the Government: "I must confess that the detailed workings of the Football League is beyond my remit and realm of knowledge. Had he asked about the County Championship, I would have been better placed to answer.

"However, I think he should ask his own committee for this debate as it would be very well subscribed and a matter of great interest to many members."

After rejecting the PBP proposals, Premier League clubs committed to continuing their strategic review of the game's finances and structures.

Manchester United executive vice-chairman Ed Woodward, who admitted on Wednesday that his club had played an "active role" in PBP discussions, said: "We are pleased that the Premier League has committed to work together on a plan for the future structures and financing of English football.

"Now it must deliver on that promise, and we are committed to playing a leading role in pushing that process towards a successful outcome."

PA

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in