Owner insists he will not throw money at Liverpool

Ian Herbert
Sunday 17 October 2010 19:00 EDT
Comments
(Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Liverpool's new owner John W Henry yesterday attempted to temper expectation at Anfield but did admit that he decided to spend his £300m on Liverpool because the new Uefa rules that limit debt carried by clubs such as Manchester City should make for a more even playing field.

Henry, who assured the Liverpool manager, Roy Hodgson, about his future on Saturday and sat beside Steven Gerrard at a lunch with the players, has made it clear that his New England Sports Ventures (NESV) investors will not throw money at Liverpool. But by making Liverpool almost debt-free, while Manchester United face the drain of huge annual interest payments, they believe that it is a realistic aspiration to strive for a title within three seasons. "If the [Uefa] Financial Fair Play rules are... not that strong, why was the transfer window down 25 per cent last year?" Henry said. "The clubs have to comply."

To make Liverpool compete again, the owners intend to drive up the club's revenues to reinvest in players and have studied the Arsenal model of achieving playing excellence without huge debts or extravagant spending.

But, having recently spent time at the Emirates and watched a game there, Henry and his partner, Tom Werner, believe they are some distance behind Arsène Wenger's club.

"You look at match-day revenues [here], revenues in general, these guys have done a tremendous job of increasing revenues, but if you look at the network that Wenger has, [you realise there's work to do]."

Liverpool's former owner Tom Hicks has vowed to pursue the directors through the English courts for damages for undervaluing the club. But Henry dismissed the idea he had purchased Liverpool at cut-price. "I know some people are saying this was a cheap price. There is no way we look at this as a cheap price," he said. "There were big financial issues, but we made a decision that we really wanted to compete at this level."

Henry, who will be at a Liverpool board meeting today to discuss how much money will be made available in the January transfer window, also plans to meet the Share Liverpool group, who propose the idea of fan ownership at the club.

The billionaire revealed that his young wife, Linda Pizzuti, had encouraged him to buy Liverpool, badgering him to approach Hicks last January. Hicks was too preoccupied to speak but his son, Tom Hicks Jnr, turned Henry down flat. The new owners will add Jeffrey Vinik – owner of the Tampa Bay Lightning and a minority owner of the Boston Red Sox, which they own – and Michael Gordon, an NESV partner, to the Liverpool board. Henry and Werner will also be on the board.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in