Newcastle United takeover: Premier League responds to Amnesty International concerns over Saudi Arabia
Premier League chief executive Richard Masters assured that the necessary tests are being carried out with ‘vigour’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Premier League has responded to Amnesty International’s concerns over Saudi Arabia’s takeover of Newcastle United, assuring the human rights organisation that the necessary processes are being carried out with rigour.
Amnesty International had written to the Premier League urging them to prevent the consortium backed by Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund – chaired by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman – from completing the £300m takeover.
The takeover is expected to be completed by 1 May, providing its new ownership passes the Premier League’s Owners’ and Directors’ Test, designed to ensure parties “meet standards greater than that required under law so as to protect the reputation and image of the game”.
Amnesty UK director Kate Allen claimed that the Premier League “risked becoming a patsy” and a vehicle to distract from the country’s human rights abuses.
“So long as these questions (concerning Saudi Arabia’s human rights record) remain unaddressed, the Premier League is putting itself at risk of becoming a patsy of those who want to use the glamour and prestige of Premier League football to cover up actions that are deeply immoral, in breach of international law and at odds with the values of the Premier League and the global footballing community,” she wrote in a letter to Premier League chief executive Richard Masters.
In response on Wednesday afternoon, Masters wrote: “You will appreciate that these matters are often subject to media speculation but at their heart are due processes, required by UK law and by the Premier League’s own rules, which cannot be conducted in public and on which we cannot comment.
“However, I can assure you that these processes go beyond those required by UK Company Law and they are applied with equal rigour to every single prospective purchase of a Premier League club.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments