Newcastle 0 Manchester City 2: Cheick Tiote admits 'I don't understand' after goal is ruled out for offside
Midfielder urges team to move on from controversy and focus on positive performance
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Newcastle midfielder Cheick Tiote revealed he could not understand referee Mike Jones' decision to rule out his stunning strike in Sunday's 2-0 defeat against Manchester City.
The Ivory Coast international looked to have cancelled out Edin Dzeko's opener when he drilled home from distance in the 34th minute, but after speaking to assistant Stephen Child, Jones ruled out the goal, much to the disgust of the Magpies faithful and manager Alan Pardew.
It appeared that Jones and his official ruled that Yoan Gouffran - who was stood in an offside position when Tiote struck the ball - was interfering with an opponent by distracting Manchester City goalkeeper Joe Hart.
"I don't understand why the referee didn't give the goal," Tiote told Sky Sports.
"I think it was Gouffran who was next to the goalie but he didn't touch it. I don't know why the assistant referee decided to give offside.
"That's football, we need to accept it and go forward.
"I'm so disappointed today but I think we played well and that's the most important thing. We can take it on to the next game."
The controversy raised the temperature at St James' Park for the remainder of the contest, with Newcastle pushing hard for an equaliser before Alvaro Negredo struck in added time to finally put the result to bed.
Pardew's angry touchline confrontation with City boss Manuel Pellegrini did nothing to calm the mood in the stands, with the Newcastle manager appearing to aim a foul-mouthed volley at the Chilean as they squared up.
"I apologise for that," Pardew told Sky Sports. "But he had words with me first and it was just normal for managers that go unseen most of the time.
"We're fine, I shook his hand at the end and I'll see him before I go."
Pardew tracked down referee Jones after the match to discuss the disallowed goal and revealed he was not satisfied with the answers he received.
"For me, this is an entertainment business. The guy's hit a goal that Joe Hart is just not going to save. It goes through a number of bodies but his vision is not impaired," he said.
"I don't think he was clear in his answers about Joe Hart being impaired - I couldn't work that out.
"I don't understand it. Even if Man City's back four is on the edge of the box and we've got four offside, it's such a clean hit, it's going in the top corner.
"He's got that wrong and unfortunately that was a massive call. In these type of games that have got to go your way.
"It was probably easier for him to give the goal and I can't understand why he hasn't.
"We're crying out for entertainment, you hit and goal like that the place is in uproar, and he's gone on a real tiny technicality, which I think is wrong."
PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments