Manchester United executives view Celtic safe standing, as pressure for a trial Old Trafford area grows

The Supporters’ Trust helped organise the visit to Parkhead’s 2,975-capacity standing section

Ian Herbert
Chief Sportswriter
Monday 10 October 2016 12:06 EDT
Comments
A scene outside Manchester United's ground Old Trafford
A scene outside Manchester United's ground Old Trafford (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Senior Manchester United executives have visited Celtic’s ground to examine its safe standing area as supporters’ representatives seek to push for it to be introduced to a section of Old Trafford.

The Manchester United Supporters’ Trust helped organise the visit to Parkhead’s 2,975-capacity standing section, opened this season, and there are hopes that the prospect of an Old Trafford equivalent by way of rail seating will be discussed at the next fans’ forum next month.

United chief executive, Ed Woodward, has always been willing to explore the idea, with his experience of standing at Chelmsford City, in his native Essex, being a contributory factor. But the club’s willingness to discuss rail seating has always been tempered by a realisation that it would require new legislation overturning the parameters of the 1989 Football Spectators Act, which decreed that stadia in the two top divisions must be all-seater. Clubs would need to get Premier League guidance on whether legislation would be required.

A key development is that Liverpool supporters’ groups are now showing signs of support. Members of the Liverpool supporters’ union Spirit of Shankly were asked at last month’s AGM whether the organisation should adopt a position on rail seating. A total of 93 per cent voted in favour, 4.7 per cent were against and 2.3 per cent abstained.

All-seat regulations were introduced into English football by Lord Justice Taylor’s report into the Hillsborough disaster, when 96 Liverpool fans were unlawfully killed. The prospect of standing returning to Premier League and Championship grounds in any form – it is allowed at League One and Two levels – is an emotive issue for those affected by Hillsborough.

The illegality of introducing a standing area is spelt out in a letter to the Football Supporters’ Federation chairman Malcolm Clarke in 2007 from the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, stating the Government cannot "repeal" orders directing the Football Licensing Authority without a change in legislation. The legislation does not apply in Scotland, thus allowing Celtic to open their own area.

Celtic's new 2,600 capacity safe-standing area
Celtic's new 2,600 capacity safe-standing area (Celtic FC)

A survey by the Stretford End Flags (SEF) organisation has underlined support for the idea among United supporters. A 93 per cent vote in favour – identically mirroring the support in Liverpool has been followed up by SEF canvassing supporters on where they would like a safe standing area to be.

Fans’ representatives from all 20 Premier League clubs left a meeting with the league’s chief executive Richard Scudamore in July encouraged that new legislation may not be needed. The official Premier League stance has been that the requirement for legislation would make the change prohibitive. But there is a growing sense that a groundswell of requests from individual clubs could result in the league approaching Government for clarification that rail seats do meet existing regulations.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in