Leicester City: The chart that shows how the champions' transfer budget was dwarfed by their Premier League rivals

Leicester's squad cost just a quarter of what Manchester City paid for their current players

Jack de Menezes
Tuesday 03 May 2016 07:00 EDT
Comments
Claudio Ranieri has had significantly less funds to work with than his rivals
Claudio Ranieri has had significantly less funds to work with than his rivals (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Leicester’s Premier League triumph has been heralded as one of the greatest stories in sporting history, with their title success undoubtedly the most remarkable top-flight success in the British game.

But their victory, which comes with two matches to spare, is all the more impressive given how their squad shapes up financially compared to the Premier League’s heavyweights of Manchester City, United and Chelsea among others.

Both City and Chelsea have splashed the cash since their respective takeovers by Sheikh Mansour and Roman Abramovich, while United have demonstrated their firepower in the transfer market other the last two seasons with Louis van Gaal spending £250m in the transfer market – with little success.

Taking into account City’s current squad, which features big-money signings such as Kevin De Bruyne [£58m], Raheem Sterling [£44m] and Sergio Aguero (£38m], the club boasts an incredible £411m worth of players on their books, and if the reports are to be believed that could increase by some margin next season when Manuel Pellegrini departs and Pep Guardiola arrives.

United are a relatively close second, with the likes of Anthony Martial [£36m] and Juan Mata [£37.1] seeing their squad total £391.1m, while Chelsea, Liverpool and Arsenal trail some way behind.

Leicester fans celebrate

Leicester's squad, of course, doesn’t compare to the Premier League heavyweights, but it’s when you look at the size of the gap and the number of clubs in-between the Foxes and the most expensive squads.


Chart: Statista

 Chart: Statista
 (Statista Charts)

The current Leicester squad totals just £52.8m, according to CIES Football Observatory, and it puts them 17th on the list of most expensive clubs with only the promoted teams this season below them in the chart.

The figure is helped by some remarkable scouting and transfer business by the staff at Leicester, with N’Golo Kante joining for a reported £5.6m, Jamie Vardy for a non-league record of £1m and Riyad Mahrez arriving from Le Havre for a cut-price £400,000.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in