Ferguson admits improper conduct

United's manager requests personal hearing after accepting FA charge for attack on referee

Phil Shaw
Tuesday 27 October 2009 21:00 EDT
Comments
(GETTY IMAGES)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Guilty as charged. Sir Alex Ferguson held his hands up yesterday and accepted a charge of improper conduct following his tirade against Alan Wiley, the Staffordshire referee, to whom he has already apologised.

The Manchester United manager's admission of culpability is unlikely to mark a volte-face in his attitude towards those referees who fail to meet his exacting standards. Realistically, Ferguson had no other option, having made his comments on camera.

Now, by pleading guilty, he doubtless hopes to persuade the Football Association to view his outburst with leniency, at the same time defusing the hostility of the refereeing fraternity and sections of the media.

Ferguson, who criticised the 49-year-old Wiley's fitness after United's 2-2 draw with Sunderland at Old Trafford on 3 October, has requested a personal hearing. The date for that has yet to be decided by the FA. The 67-year-old Scot faced demands for him to be given a lengthy touchline ban by Prospect, the union that represents match officials.

After United averted defeat with a late equaliser, Ferguson accused Wiley of "walking up the pitch for the second goal needing a rest". He added: "He wasn't fit enough for a game of that standard. The pace of the game demanded a referee who was fit. He was not fit.

"It is an indictment of our game. You see referees abroad who are as fit as butcher's dogs. We have some who are fit. He wasn't. He was taking 30 seconds to book a player. He was needing a rest. It was ridiculous."

An apology – "for any personal embarrassment that my remarks may have caused, and to the FA for going public with my views" – did not produce the closure Ferguson hoped for. He now faces the possibility of a fine or a touchline ban.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in