FA covered up 13 failed drugs tests before Saido Berahino ban was revealed

An emphasis on educating and rehabilitating players who test positive for recreational drugs outside of competition has led to failed tests being kept private

Jack de Menezes
Friday 10 February 2017 05:27 EST
Comments
13 failed drugs tests were covered up by the Football Association before Saido Berahino's positive test
13 failed drugs tests were covered up by the Football Association before Saido Berahino's positive test (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Football Association has kept 13 failed drugs tests quiet since 2012 in the latest revelations to cast scrutiny on the way the governing body handles the use of recreational drugs in the sport.

The Daily Mail revealed last week that new Stoke City signing Saido Berahino served an eight-week suspension imposed by the FA after reportedly testing positive for the ecstasy-based drug MDMA while playing for West Bromwich Albion.

The positive test was kept quiet by all parties involved, with the FA arguing that keeping matters private was important for helping the players to recover, but the Daily Mail has now released a fresh report that 13 footballers tested positive for recreational drugs in the period between July 2012 and June 2016, before Berahino’s failed test.

While the number of positive cases discovered in out-of-competition testing is a very small number of the total number of tests carried out – working out to 0.17 per cent – it will still cause alarm among fans that other reasons are being given for players who serve bans.

West Brom manager maintains that his original decision to drop Berahino from his first-team squad was due to fitness reasons, but fans did not know that part of his three-month absence was also due to an eight-week suspension.

While the FA face criticism for covering up the use of recreational drugs, they are one of few governing bodies who test for them outside of competition. The report adds that the FA hope to complete as many as 5,000 tests-a-season by 2018, with the number of tests carried out by UK Anti-Doping testers last season registered at 2,442.

While there have been 13 positive tests, it is not thought to involve as many as 13 other players, given that former Sheffield United striker Jose Baxter is alleged to have failed to drugs tests, with the 24-year-old currently serving a 12-month ban that expires in June this year.

Former Wolves goalkeeper Aaron McCarey also failed a drugs test after the club confirmed a positive sample in May 2015, with the 25-year-old since moving to Ross County in Scotland. The rest of the identities remain unknown.

The reason why recreational drugs are not being dealt with in the same fashion as doping offences – which tend to bring a two-year ban for positive tests – is that UK Anti-Doping are hoping to educate and rehabilitate players rather than punish them for out-of-competition transgressions.

Berahino served an eight-week ban in 2016
Berahino served an eight-week ban in 2016 (Getty)

Speaking after it was revealed that two Premiership rugby players tested positive last season for recreational drugs, UK Sport’s former anti-doping chief, Michele Verroken, said: “Football, rugby and cricket are focusing on the illicit recreational drugs outside of competition and then applying misconduct penalties because it's not really a doping offence.

“They want players to come forward and seek help, go through clinical assessment and rehabilitation.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in