Dodgy: Tottenham trolled by Google again - search engine uses Spurs to define another word following 'lackadaisical'

Try searching the words and see what happens

Simon Rice
Tuesday 03 February 2015 07:59 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Suspicions that Google is an Arsenal fan will only increase after Tottenham were used to help define yet another derogatory term on the world's biggest search engine.

Last month it was spotted that if the word 'lackadaisical' was typed into Google it provided a definition (lacking enthusiasm and determination; carelessly lazy) and then used it in a sentence with a little help from Mauricio Pochettino's side.

It stated: "a lackadaisical defence left Spurs adrift in the second half".

Now Tottenham have been used to help define the word 'dodgy'.

Google defines the word as 'dishonest or unreliable; potentially dangerous; of low quality' and then uses it in a sentence.

It reads: "Spurs' dodgy defence has thrown away a 2-0 lead".

Synonyms for 'dodgy' include second-rate, third-rate, substandard and low-quality.

But before Tottenham fans start getting all Jose Mourinho and claim there is a campaign against them, it should be noted that the entry isn't the fault of Google. The search engine gets their definitions direct from Oxford Dictionaries, published by Oxford University Press.

The first edition was published in 1888, a second edition in 1989 and OED Online was launched in 2000.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in