Burnley defender James Tarkowski given three-game ban for violent conduct

The 25-year-old elbowed forward Glenn Murray in the 35th minute of Burnley's 0-0 draw against Brighton on Saturday

Matt Slater
Thursday 21 December 2017 08:02 EST
Comments
Tarkowski and his club tried to argue that the three-game suspension was excessive
Tarkowski and his club tried to argue that the three-game suspension was excessive (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Burnley defender James Tarkowski will miss his side's next three matches after he accepted a Football Association charge of violent conduct.

The highly-rated 25-year-old elbowed Brighton forward Glenn Murray in the 35th minute of their 0-0 draw in the Premier League on Saturday.

Tarkowski and his club tried to argue that the three-game suspension was excessive but this was rejected by an independent regulatory commission.

The ban, which was confirmed by an FA statement, means Burnley will be without one of the league's best defenders so far this season for the visit of Tottenham on Saturday, and the trips to Manchester United on Boxing Day and Huddersfield on December 30.

Off-the-ball incidents not seen by the officials but picked up by the cameras are viewed by a three-strong panel of former elite referees. For a violent conduct charge to be issued, the panel must be unanimous.

Speaking to reporters after the game, Brighton boss Chris Hughton was in no doubt that the officials had missed some foul play.

"It's a penalty. I've seen the elbow afterwards and it's a definite elbow on Glenn in the box and it's in play, the throw-in has been taken," said Hughton.

"Sometimes you can be critical of referees and sometimes not so.

"It's difficult to see, when it happens at that pace of the game.

"I think for the referee (Chris Kavanagh) not to see it or a linesman not to see it, I can half understand that one but it's certainly a penalty."

Murray said: "I can't remember what happened. I felt something in my ribs, the referee didn't see it so whatever."

Tarkowski had earlier been somewhat harshly adjudged to have fouled Murray for a penalty, which the former Crystal Palace striker smashed over the bar.

PA

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in