Arsene Wenger will not put Arsenal 'in trouble' by shattering wage structure to keep Alexis Sanchez
The Chilean has been offered £400,000-a-week to move to China
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Arsene Wenger has told Alexis Sanchez that he will not shatter Arsenal’s wage structure and put the club in “trouble” just to offer him the money he could earn in China.
Sanchez has been offered at least £400,000 per week to play in the Chinese Super League, a figure that the Chilean is leveraging to demand Arsenal more than double his current salary.
While an agreement on a new deal is now unlikely, Wenger told Sanchez that he would not jeopardise the club’s financial health in order to keep him. Even as Arsenal consider offering Sanchez up to £300,000 per week, Wenger said that he was “always” wary of destabilising the dressing room by paying one player so much more than everyone else earns.
“We have to consider our financial potential,” Wenger warned, “to sustain the wages for the whole squad.”
“You have many different opinions there. Some people tell me ‘just give him what he wants’. But then you cannot respect anymore the wage structure, and you put the club in trouble as well.”
However there are some Arsenal fans who do not want the club to compromise themselves for a player who would rather be elsewhere, which is why Wenger knows he cannot give in to everything Sanchez wants. “Always the club has to be the priority. I understand as well that top players are a big priority. But at the end of the day even for important players you can only pay as much as you can afford.”
The problem is that it is difficult for Premier League clubs to maintain wage structures when their players could multiply their salaries in China. That distorts salary negotiations, or in Wenger’s words, “contributes to the imagination of the players”. Wenger told Sanchez to forget about going to China and focus on playing at the top level in Europe instead. For a truly top player, Wenger said, going to play in the CSL was “not a debate”.
“I think every club and every player has to make decisions,” Wenger said, giving his strongest warning yet against taking the money. “Where are your priorities? Where do you want to play? I think the first priority for top players is play to best with the best players and in the best league.”
“After that you do not have to make a choice anymore where – you go to China because you earn big money,” he said. “You make big money in England as well. So you can combine the best combination of playing at the top and [earning] big money, in England at the moment. So China for me is not a debate.”
But clearly Wenger accepts that he cannot expect to offer Sanchez, or for that matter Mesut Ozil, just a small increase on their current salaries and expect to keep them. His old prudence is under threat and the club will have to pay more than they have ever paid before. The old structures can be rigid, and Wenger is willing to go to unprecedented levels. But there is always a limit.
“We must accept that also modern life has changed a little bit,” Wenger said. “We always had a wage schedule that was respected. But players earn so much money now that the cases have become much more individual than global.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments