Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Tom Peck: Fifa's backers have the clout to produce change

If the storm around Fifa really is moving towards some kind of end-game, the sponsors are the key pieces

Tom Peck
Tuesday 25 November 2014 18:40 EST
Comments
The Fifa sign outside their headquarters in Zurich
The Fifa sign outside their headquarters in Zurich (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

If the storm around Fifa really is moving towards some kind of end-game, the sponsors are the key pieces.

Fifa serves little function other than to generate as much money as it can on the back of the game of football, a task which is relatively straightforward given how widely the game is loved around the world (a fact that has little to do with anything Fifa has acheived in the last 50 years). The constant disbelief and criticism that surrounds the governing body it can handle because, in the end, along comes the football itself, everybody loves it, the bottom line is unaffected, and the saga rolls on.

The constant scandals, the constant chipping away at a facade that clearly covers grave wrongdoing are merely an inconvenience – albeit a serious one – for Fifa. Yet, if the money, in the hundreds of millions of dollars, stops coming in, well that is a different story altogether.

It is the sponsors’ money, for the most part, that is being spent on dubious football “development projects”, overseen by some shadowy sports administrator who supervises the arrival of cash. Though they only rarely say so in public, sponsors definitely don’t like it.

Sony may very well have ended this deal regardless. The contract was up, they do not have the resources to renew it, that’s the end of it. But more often than not, top-level sponsors, like Coca-Cola and Adidas, are in it for the very long term. These deals tend to get renewed.

If Samsung come in and replace Sony, and pay more for the privilege, then it is of only limited significance. But Sony comes after a similar walk out from Emirates Airlines earlier this month, and the criticism from Coke will also give Fifa something to think about.

Sponsors should not have to take a moral stand. The law of the land should be sufficient. In this case, it is clearly not.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in