Q & A: Premier League TV ruling
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Q: What was the European Court of Justice's (ECJ) decision.
A: The court ruled against the Premier League, and in favour of Portsmouth publican Karen Murphy, to say that she should be allowed to buy a foreign satellite decoder to show matches at 3pm on Saturdays.
Q: What are the implications of the decision?
A: On the face of it, anyone in the UK should now be able to buy decoders to watch matches at any time. That could lead to the Premier League being forced to sell their TV rights in one giant pan-European package.
Q: What else can the Premier League do?
A: There is a still a long way to go in the legal battles. They could also introduce their own Premier League subscription TV channel, or maintain sales on a country-by-country basis but exclude countries such as Greece who do not pay very much and yet are providing cheap alternatives to Sky for pubs and clubs.
Q: Will it be cheaper for the man in the street?
A: No - the saving is really for pubs. Greek station Nova charges £45 per month for sports, much the same as Sky for non-commercial consumers, and there is the cost of the equipment too.
Q: Was the ECJ decision a completely clear-cut ruling?
A: Being a European court, of course not. The ECJ also stated that although the matches could not be subject to copyright, the Premier League's anthem and "various graphics" could be.
Q: What does that mean?
A: It allows the Premier League to argue in court that all logos shown during matches are their copyright, and therefore they have to give permission to the likes of Karen Murphy for live football to be shown.
Q: Does that mean it will be going back to court?
A: Yes indeed - next stop the High Court.
PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments