Cruyff says Champions' League is overblown

Tommy Staniforth
Wednesday 22 September 1999 18:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

JOHAN CRUYFF has criticised the quality of this year's expanded Champions' League, describing the competition as "decaffeinated".

JOHAN CRUYFF has criticised the quality of this year's expanded Champions' League, describing the competition as "decaffeinated".

The former Dutch international and Barcelona coach regards the new format for the competition, which has expanded by eight teams to 32, as anexercise in earning money. "This first stage of the competition doesn't interest me," Cruyff said yesterday. "This has changed just to make moremoney. It only really starts in March. What are teams like Molde and AIK going to achieve? It's all very nice but it doesn't count for anything."

Real Madrid supporters clearly agreed with Cruyff on Tuesday, staying away in their thousands as Norway's Molde were beaten 4-1. Crowdestimates at the 87,000-capacity Santiago Bernabeu ranged from 8,000 to 15,000.

Nicolas Anelka's Spanish misadventure took a turn for the worse when Real announced he had sprained his knee against Molde. The £23mformer Arsenal striker suffered the injury in the first half but continued to play before being substituted 10 minutes after the interval. Anelka, 20,arrived at the club's training ground yesterday limping and has been ruled out for 10 to 15 days, keeping him out of Saturday's League game againstMalaga.

The injury is the latest setback for Anelka, and Real's Welsh coach, John Toshack, who convinced the club's directors to part with the massivetransfer fee to bring the French international to Spain after the unhappy turn of events at Arsenal. He has yet to score a goal and on Tuesday Toshackadmitted: "He does not look comfortable at the moment and after that performance he is probably lacking even more confidence. The last thing Iwanted to do was substitute him. But I had to think of the team."

The Anelka saga has even brought the club under fire from the former Spanish national coach, Javier Clemente, who critcised Real for spending sucha huge amount of money on the Frenchman.

"Anelka's price is an insult to national [Spanish] society. It is a modest country with many cultural, social, political and employment problems,"Clemente said. "To pay that much money when it could be spent on many other things is a shame."

In Italy, Ibrahim Ba, Perugia's on-loan winger, has been handed a four- game ban following his attack on Cagliari's Fabio Macellari at the weekend.

Television evidence showed the 25-year-old head-butting the defender in an off-the-ball incident that was missed by the referee and his assistants.The former French international was making his debut for Perugia, whom he has joined from Milan until the end of the season after turning down asimilar move to Middlesbrough.

Ba is the first footballer in Italy to be punished on the basis of video evidence alone. "They've picked on us to begin experimenting with a new rule,"Perugia's president, Luciano Gaucci, said. "I didn't expect it, even though Ba did an absurd thing and deserved to be punished. But that should havecome from the referee and not TV evidence. It's like awarding a penalty when the referee didn't see it."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in