Terriers to sue over Cup exit

Pa
Wednesday 01 December 1999 19:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Huddersfield Town are have vowed to seek compensation over a "ludicrous" and "disgraceful" refereeing performance that they believe may have robbed them of a money-spinning appearance in the last eight of the Worthington Cup.

Huddersfield Town are have vowed to seek compensation over a "ludicrous" and "disgraceful" refereeing performance that they believe may have robbed them of a money-spinning appearance in the last eight of the Worthington Cup.

Terriers chairman Ian Ayre is fuming over Jeff Winter's decision not to award Huddersfield a 90th-minute penalty in the Division One side's 2-1 extra-time defeat at home to Premiership Wimbledon on Tuesday night and also by the referee's subsequent explanation to manager Steve Bruce.

Ayre and Bruce were at a loss to understand why Huddersfield were not given a spot-kick when they believed Clyde Wijnhard had been fouled in the opposition's penalty area.

But what angered the chairman even more were Winter's comments to Bruce after the final whistle.

"He said that, while he had seen the incident and agreed it would have been a penalty, he had not given it because their player was fouled by Wijnhard before he then wrestled him to the ground," Ayre told Radio 5 Live.

"That being the case, our view is that he should have given the foul - but he did not give either.

"For him to come out and say what he has is disgraceful. Two wrongs do not make a right."

As well as the cost to Huddersfield themselves, Ayre believes football as a whole have been dealt a raw deal.

"Mr Winter has done referees a disservice as much as anyone here. It is the referee making that comment after the game that I think is ludicrous."

Financial injustice is also a major issue with Ayre, who added: "Somebody has denied a huge financial incentive (in a quarter-final against Bolton) to a club like ourselves.

"I think the referee needs to be put in his place for this.

"We are speaking to our solicitors today ... and perhaps there is an element of compensation here."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in