Bates claims Leeds are in the clear over ownership

John Nisbet
Wednesday 06 April 2011 19:00 EDT
Comments
(GETTY IMAGES)

Your support helps us to tell the story

As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.

Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.

Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election

Head shot of Andrew Feinberg

Andrew Feinberg

White House Correspondent

Ken Bates yesterday insisted there would be no issue surrounding the ownership of Leeds United should they get promoted to the Premier League – and suggested a House of Commons select committee should be worrying about more important things.

The Leeds chief executive, Shaun Harvey, told MPs last month the club's owners are a holding company called FSF based in the West Indian island of Nevis, owned by three discretionary trusts.

Premier League chief executive Richard Scudamore told the inquiry into football being held by the select committee on culture media and sport on Tuesday that Leeds would have to be more transparent about their owners should they earn a place in the top flight.

But Bates, the Leeds chairman, yesterday told Yorkshire Radio: "We are fully aware of Premiership rules because when the Football League drafted their rules they did them in consultation with the Premier League to make sure that they fitted in with each other and we satisfied the Football League. We know exactly what the requirements are of the Premier League rules and we do not anticipate any problems in meeting those requirements."

Scudamore told the committee that if Leeds were to be promoted the Premier League would apply rules in a stricter manner than the Football League have. "The Football League have chosen not to apply the rule as robustly as we think we will be applying it," he said. "The Football League have one view of how to interpret that rule and we have a more stern or harsh view of what the rule means.

"Our clubs absolutely agree unanimously that we should tell the public who owns the clubs and anything short of that is inadequate."

But Bates, a former Chelsea chairman, believes they are "missing the point": "I think it is a sad comment on this select committee when they have so many things to talk about and really look at in detail, and depth, all they are concerned about is Capello's contract and Leeds United," he said. "It says one of two things; is this select committee entirely missing the point or, alternatively, there is not a lot wrong with the state of football."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in