Apologies and bans are not enough for Warnock

Match officials suspended and inquiry called after clear Palace 'goal' is disallowed

Gordon Tynan
Sunday 16 August 2009 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Keith Hackett, the head of the referees' union, has issued a public apology and the Football League has suspended the offending officials pending a review, but nothing appears likely to appease the Crystal Palace manager Neil Warnock in the wake of his side's controversial 1-0 defeat at Bristol City on Saturday.

The referee, Rob Shoebridge, disallowed a Palace "goal" after a 30th-minute shot from Freddie Sears struck the back of the Bristol City net and rebounded back into play, a decision which looked woeful even before the harsh spotlight of television replays. An 89th-minute winning goal from Nicky Maynard did not improve the mood of Warnock, who refused to shake hands with City players or their manager, Gary Johnson, on the final whistle, claiming that the hosts should have assisted the referee.

"I think they should have gone up the pitch and put the ball in their net," Warnock said. "That's happened in the past, when it's as obvious as that, as blatant as that. It absolutely stinks when you can't get a genuine goal at a place like that.

"Harry Redknapp rang me and said, 'It's the 21st century, how long since we had a man on the moon?' Fifa won't let us have cameras on the goal-line, so what's to stop a fourth official from looking at a monitor for 20 seconds for an incident like this? We've been let down by four people, not one person in black could see it. Even the fourth official and linesman at our end could see that it went in. It's absolutely ridiculous. I don't know how they keep their jobs."

Warnock's opposite number Johnson remained unrepentant about events and clutched at the straw of a Palace infringement in the build-up to the "goal," although no free-kick was given.

"Personally, I don't know what it hit, but people's first reaction was that it looked like decent goal," Johnson said. "But the lads were saying the linesmen said it was a push in the end, even though the ball went in the net."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in