Taylor denies Eduardo punishment had 'Scottish influence'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Uefa's general secretary David Taylor has insisted there was no 'old pals' act' surrounding the disciplinary action against Arsenal striker Eduardo for diving against Celtic.
Taylor is the former chief executive of the Scottish FA, and his successor Gordon Smith had led calls for Uefa to ban Eduardo.
The striker was given a two-match ban by European football's governing body. Arsenal are appealing and Gunners manager Arsene Wenger claimed there had been "a witch-hunt" with the case being influenced by "Scottish people working at Uefa".
Taylor, however, claimed that was not the case, saying: "It's not all pals together, we're in football and you disagree with people."
It is understood Taylor would have preferred Smith not have got involved as Uefa were already looking at the incident in which Eduardo went down under a challenge from Celtic keeper Artur Boruc to win a penalty.
The UEFA general secretary met Wenger last week at a coaches' forum in Switzerland and tried to explain the reasoning behind the decision.
Taylor told Bloomberg: "There's a clear difference of opinion. We believe this was something that infringed the regulations and there was an obvious intent to deceive the referee."
He also denied claims that this would set a dangerous precedent with Uefa now needing to take action on dozens of matches.
He added: "That won't be the case. There has to be significant detriment to the opposing team. We are not talking throw-ins, corners kicks, things happening elsewhere on the pitch.
"We're talking about things like the sending-off of players, or penalties which are scored where the other team suffers significant disadvantage."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments