'Bribery' puts Porto out of Champions League
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Porto have been thrown out of next season's Champions League by Uefa, European football's governing body. The club were last month punished in Portugal for trying to influence the outcome of domestic matches by allegedly bribing referees in 2003-04, the season they won the Champions League and when Jose Mourinho was in charge of the club.
In a statement, Uefa said the alleged bribery meant Porto broke rules that ban "any activity aimed at arranging or influencing the outcome of a match at national or international level."
Porto, who were also tarnished by match-fixing allegations during the Nineties, said they would appeal.
Last month the Portuguese Football League stripped Porto of six points and fined the club €150,000 (£119,000) after investigating two matches that took place in 2003-04. There is no suggestion that Mourinho was involved.
Porto won last season's Portuguese title for the third time in a row, 14 points ahead of Sporting Lisbon.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments