The key factor that could see Manchester United finally sign sporting director Dan Ashworth from Newcastle
Ashworth is on gardening leave while the two Premier League clubs negotiate compensation
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Dan Ashworth’s prolonged move to Manchester United is being almost entirely dictated by concerns over Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR) which has evolved into “a game of chicken” more than a stand-off over the fee with Newcastle United.
Newcastle are insistent on compensation of £25m, which has completely stalled the move of the highly rated sporting director. However, Manchester United feel their leverage on the deal is starting to increase as Newcastle’s preference is to have the situation sorted in the next six weeks so that the income counts towards this cycle's PSR rules.
PSR allow Premier League clubs to lose up to £105m over every three-season period. Clubs who have breached the rules, such as Everton and Nottingham, have been hit with points deductions.
The Old Trafford club are meanwhile similarly conscious of how close they are to the limit, with the regulations even potentially influencing the decision on Erik ten Hag’s future. Any dismissal would bring considerable compensation, while any prospective replacement may require a similar fee. While the situation suggests that both clubs will come to a deal before the June cut-off, there is currently extreme intransigence on both sides due to how much it can influence future recruitment decisions.
Another factor is Ineos would prefer to have Ashworth in sooner precisely to be involved in such stategising. Manchester United’s new hierarchy identified him as the top option in terms of deciding future football strategy.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments