Football: Newcastle face court threat from fans
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NEWCASTLE UNITED are facing High Court proceedings over their decision to move season-ticket holders to accommodate corporate clients at St James' Park.
Solicitors yesterday issued proceedings against the club at the High Court in Leeds on behalf of bondholder Jane Duffy, leader of the Save Our Seats campaign, which was mounted when the club announced plans to move up to 4,000 fans.
Ms Duffy is seeking an injunction to protect her current seat and a ruling that the pounds 500 bond she bought in 1994 entitles her to a specific seat. Mr Justice Hopper, the presiding judge of the north-east circuit, will sit at the first hearing on Tuesday.
Ms Duffy's solicitor, Richard Cramer, said: "There could be as many as 600 bondholders involved, and what they are seeking is to stay in their seats. That is what they believed they were entitled to when they purchased their bonds.
"The bond scheme is a very, very good way of raising money in the short term, and that is what Newcastle did. But they have got to stick to their part of the contract and they have clearly not done so."
Bondholders believed they had purchased the right to a specific seat for 10 years but the club insists that the guarantee extends only to a seat. Fans made a stand-up protest during United's televised 2-1 victory over Derby on 25 October.
The club claim to have satisfied the vast majority of those affected with other seats and work is currently in progress to increase stadium capacity to 52,000 by August - but the row refuses to die down.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments