Football: Fan's eye view Chelsea: Managers taking note not to lose their heads

Matthew Rowan
Friday 11 December 1998 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

NOWADAYS THERE is no saying where England players will place their hard-earned caps because, according to Glenn Hoddle, they might either have "their winning heads on", "their aggressive heads on" or "their sensible heads on". Sometimes, they have nothing above their shoulders at all, which is probably why Graham Taylor once referred to them as "headless chickens". That is what being the England manager does to a man's grasp of anatomy.

There were no such problems for Hoddle in his days as Chelsea manager because, when it came to communication, he only ever had one head on - his writing head. Admittedly, his column in the matchday programme could become a bit precious in its homage to "playing football the right way" - especially when, in his first 18 months at Chelsea, the "right way" tended to mean short pass, short pass, back- pass, short pass and then, as the opposition settled down for a game of cards, hoof it into the box from the halfway line. That apart, though, his programme notes were an oasis of sanity - neither paranoid after defeat nor gloating in victory. Here was a man who could keep his head while all around him people were changing theirs.

You can tell a lot about a manager from his programme notes. Take John Hollins, in charge at Chelsea between 1985 and 1988, who increasingly came to resemble the demented policeman played by Herbert Lom in The Pink Panther. Here is one revealing passage, taken from a matchday column in 1986: "It takes two teams to make a great game of football and one of the teams was Chelsea and we were 3-2 in front. There were a lot of good points, as I said, the only thing is you look at the end result. If the game had been 80 minutes we would have won 3-2..." The punchline was still to come: "But we didn't, we lost 5-3."

Eventually, Hollins was on his way, his cunning plan to outfox opposing managers by leaving all his best players out of the team having mysteriously backfired. In his place came Bobby Campbell, a manager blessed with resilience and integrity but also a gift for philosophy at which Eric Cantona would have marvelled.

Campbell did not just adorn his programme notes with wise sayings, he would get them printed in capital letters. "A bottle of Scotch can be either half empty or half full," he shouted from the top of one column. The reader's reaction was to finish the bottle off for him. However, worse was to come because Campbell did not do things by halves.

In one crucial relegation match at Upton Park, Chelsea had gone down 4-1 and replaced West Ham in the danger zone. But all was explained in Campbell's programme notes for the following home game. "It's all psychological," he reasoned. "The man with half a loaf doesn't fight as hard as the man without any bread."

Chelsea were relegated but the lesson had been learned; operating on a yeast-free diet, they bounced back up again with a record number of points. West Ham, meanwhile, clearly spent the close season dining out on bread, croissants and sweet pastries; the following May they were relegated.

Campbell's philosophy was vindicated and a variety of cliches went on to make more comebacks than Peter Shilton. Among these, in the wake of one particularly poor performance, was "we weren't at the races". On one hand it could be seen as a denial: "we weren't at the races... honest!" On the other hand, it was the early stages of a mystery story, "we weren't on the pitch, we weren't at the races, so where the hell were we?" Either way, it was clear just who had been at the Scotch in the first place.

And so to more recent times and a man who evokes the celebrated film Being There. You may recall the Peter Sellers character who deals in horticultural homilies but, thanks to his impassive face and understated delivery, manages to convince world leaders that he has the answer to everything.

You have got it. Chancey Gardiner is Ruud Gullit - the "Dutch master" whose every "also", "for sure" and "that is normal" is viewed as a philosophical gem by dint of his dreadlocks, laid-back demeanour and just slightly-flawed linguistic skills. We swooned at his matchday column when he declared sagely that "a good striker needs only one piece of action". We swooned when Gianluca Vialli took his one piece of action... and blazed it high over an open goal.

So say what you like about Chelsea, but when it came to sexy programme notes, we were the champions.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in