Football: FA intends to bring no further action over the Sheringham transfer that sparked inquiry
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Football Association stressed last night that no further charges are planned as a result of the Premier League's investigations.
When the names of Brian Clough, Ronnie Fenton and Nottingham Forest were announced as central to allegations of misconduct, it was expected that the charges would relate to the transfer of Teddy Sheringham from Forest to Tottenham Hotspur for pounds 2.15m in August 1992. That deal had prompted the Premier League the following June to appoint Steve Coppell, Rick Parry and Robert Reid QC to look into the details of the Sheringham transfer alone. Only later were their inquiries broadened to include up to 40 other transfers.
The spectre of "bungs" in football had been raised during a High Court battle over control of Tottenham, when Alan Sugar claimed Terry Venables had sought to justify a pounds 50,000 payment queried by Sugar on the basis that "Cloughie liked a bung."
The former Forest manager always denied the allegation, challenging Sugar to repeat it out of court.
The commission members were divided over the matter, Coppell refusing to support Reid and Parry's assertion that Venables knew the payment, initially handed to Frank McLintock, who was acting as agent in the deal, was intended for Clough.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments