Equestrianism: Bank Bunn fight

Genevieve Murphy
Friday 30 October 1992 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A statement issued by Douglas Bunn has reopened the vexed debate about the Wembley bank on which a Swiss horse broke its leg (and was subsequently put down) at the month's Horse of the Year Show, writes Genevieve Murphy.

Bunn claims that course designers Alan Oliver, Jon Doney and Alan Ball had tried to get an accurate idea of the bank's appearance on 8 July, after they had been given details of its dimensions.

'They told Andrew Finding, secretary general of the British Show Jumping Association. . . that the proposed bank was too high, too steep and too narrow,' Bunn said.

The bank was said to resemble the one used without mishap last year at Millstreet in Ireland, which will again feature tomorrow. After the fatality, Alan Oliver (chief course designer at Wembley) flew to Millstreet.

'We'd been led to believe it was similar to the one at Wembley,' Oliver said. 'It turned out to be totally different. I wanted people to know that the course designers had nothing to do with the bank.'

Finding was not available for comment yesterday. A statement by the BSJA said: 'We contest certain of the hearsay allegations, but believe that this controversy is best handled by the BSJA executive committee. A meeting will be arranged as a matter of urgency.'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in