Durham split at the seam
Worcs 424-8 dec and 25-0 Durham 191 and 255 Worcs won by 10 wickets
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WHILE Durham may not feature prominently in selectorial thoughts, the comparison with England is unavoidable. Both of them habitually arrive for the Saturday morning of a match staring defeat eyeball to eyeball.
There are exceptions of course - before this game at Feethams, Durham had gone one better than England and, for the first time, won twice in succession - but by yesterday they were in more familiar territory. Some attractive second innings cameos were insufficient to take the match into a fourth day. It was not the stuff of rearguard actions.
The bald figures at the start were that they were 267 runs behind with four wickets left and the harsh fact was that, like someone else down the road, they did not appear to have the stomach for the fight. Durham folded within 85 minutes, the end hastened by the departure of Manoj Prabhakar. Resistance thereafter was minimal. The capitulation obliged seamer Phil Newport to return his best figures of the season. Maybe these said more about the Durham batting than his canny accuracy.
With the first part of their task thus unaccomplished, Durham followed on. The one man probably capable of playing an innings big enough to contemplate the saving of the match was John Morris and he was duly given an early opportunity to put this theory to the test.
Stewart Hutton, opening in place of Mike Roseberry who had received a blow on the helmet the previous night, edged the new ball to first slip for a routine catch. For a while Morris played vintage shots. He bludgeoned serenely through the leg side several times and was no doubt just preparing to unleash the full array when he chipped an innocuous ball carelessly to square leg for Gavin Haynes to take.
It was the kind of shot which would be called in evidence by those who would condemn the Championship for being too soft. Prabhakar and Darren Blenkiron both played attractively in a rapid century stand, but both were out when they should not have been, playing shots that failed to show due care. Newport was then reintroduced and cursorily dismissed the tail yet again. It took Worcestershire nine balls to acquire the 23 runs they needed to record their fifth win in six games.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments