DRUGS IN SPORT: IOC's new anti-doping plans criticised
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SEVEN MONTHS after holding an international conference on the escalating problem of drug abuse in sport, the International Olympic Committee is facing obstructions to its plans for a world anti-doping agency and a new anti-doping code.
The White House "drugs czar", Barry McCaffrey, said on Wednesday that the IOC's drug agency project is unacceptable, claiming it lacked "transparency, accountability and independence". It is not the first time McCaffrey and the IOC have locked horns. At the anti-drugs summit in February, IOC officials responded to McCaffrey's criticism by telling him to solve the serious doping problem in American sports before lecturing the IOC.
Dick Pound, an IOC vice-president spearheading the anti-doping project, contested McCaffrey's latest remarks. "I'm a little disappointed with his approach," Pound said. "It ignores a lot of good work that has been done leading to a consensus for the agency."
Jacques Rogge, an IOC executive board official, accused McCaffrey of ignoring the fact that the agency plans have been backed by European governments, the United Nations and the World Health Organisation.
The IOC director general, Francois Carrard, said that a Swiss foundation, run by a board of directors consisting of government and sports officials, would be set up shortly to manage the agency. The IOC has put up pounds 15m to get the agency started, promising it will be established by the end of the year.
Several issues remain to be decided, namely where the agency will be located and who will run it. Lausanne in Switzerland, where the IOC is based, is one of the sites being considered. Other cities that have expressed interest include Vienna, Madrid, Lisbon and Stockholm.
Among the agency's tasks will be to apply the IOC's controversial new "Olympic Movement Anti-Doping Code". The 95-page document sets out guidelines on drugs testing, sanctions, rules and procedures for all Olympic sports.
The code, approved by the IOC in June, is scheduled to come into effect on 1 January, but it has come under attack. The president of the Australian Olympic Committee, John Coates, has criticised the code as "unworkable". Coates, a lawyer, found numerous flaws in the document, including the definitions of doping and trafficking, and a failure to address fully the issue of out-of-competition testing.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments