Vintage Hick reaping benefits of tinkering

Worcestershire 373-8 v Warwickshire

Jon Culley
Tuesday 25 May 2004 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Given that it is 18 years since he first topped 2,000 runs in a season it could be seen as surprising that Graeme Hick, his last Test more than three years ago, is still bothered about playing cricket, let alone thinking about ways to improve, when other players - indeed former England captains - junior to him in years are thinking about retirement.

Given that it is 18 years since he first topped 2,000 runs in a season it could be seen as surprising that Graeme Hick, his last Test more than three years ago, is still bothered about playing cricket, let alone thinking about ways to improve, when other players - indeed former England captains - junior to him in years are thinking about retirement.

How do you improve on a career nudging towards 37,000 first-class runs? With difficulty is the obvious answer. Yet Hick, 38 last Sunday, is giving that proposition a fair crack. Dismayed to have added a paltry (by his standards) 670 to his aggregate last summer, he spent the winter in analysis - of video tapes, that is, not his psyche - and the results have been startling.

Yesterday, in conditions where no one could accuse him of being a flat-track bully, Hick passed his 2003 total in only his ninth innings.

Having gone into this match on the back of consecutive double hundreds, Worcestershire's most famous adopted son added 158, his tally for a still fledgling summer now 801.

It is 16 years since anyone completed 1,000 first-class runs before 1 June, the last being Hick himself. With only the second innings of this match - if, indeed, it is necessary - to come it is unlikely he will match that feat, although to have gone so close to his glorious standards of 1988, the year of his unbeaten 405 at Taunton, is quite something.

He puts it down to some fairly simple tinkering, having reverted to standing tall in the crease, bat held up, as he did in the early part of his career. How well it served him yesterday, until an error not of technique but judgement let him down.

Frustratingly, too, it seemed that it was his team-mate Andy Bichel's judgement, the Australian risking a second to mid-wicket off Ian Bell only for Neil Carter to hit the stumps at the non-striker's end with a direct hit. Hick himself had been virtually flawless, hitting 24 fours, even profiting from a mistake when an attempt to pull Carter soared off the top edge for six.

His exit, therefore, was a disappointment, although Worcestershire could not complain too bitterly about their return for batting first. Ben Smith, with whom Hick shared a county record-breaking stand of 417 against Gloucestershire last time out, helped to put on 141 for the third wicket yesterday, around which Worcestershire gathered four batting points.

It might have been more but for an untrustworthy, up and down pitch. Stephen Peters will testify to that, having survived a shooter only to succumb to a lifter from the next ball. He was a maiden first-class victim for the 20-year-old seamer Naqaash Tahir, making his debut in place of an injured Dewald Pretorius. Bell and Dougie Brown were the best bowlers, deservedly picking up two wickets each.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in