The nandrolone mystery

Mike Rowbottom
Monday 16 October 2006 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Nandrolone is an anabolic steroid which acts in a similar way to the hormone testosterone, increasing muscle size, aiding recovery and allowing harder and longer training. Its potential side-effects include kidney damage, impotence, heart and liver disease and dramatic mood swings, known as "roid rage."

Nandrolone is not a "designer steroid" - it is well known, and easy to discover. The only mystery is why sportsmen and women continue to test positive for it, although one obvious reason may be a scientifically proven incidence of the substance turning up in nutritional supplements which should not contain it.

In 1999 the International Olympic Committee laboratory in Cologne run by Professor Wilhelm Schaencer began a two-year study of nutritional supplements and discovered that a significant proportion - 16 from the first 100 investigated - had been contaminated during production with pro-hormones which the body metabolises to produce nandrolone.

The investigation was prompted by a glut of nandrolone positives in athletics involving names such as Linford Christie, Merlene Ottey, Doug Walker and Mark Richardson. In February 2001, Schaencer confirmed that contaminated supplements had caused volunteers to return urine samples well above the legal limit of two nanograms per millilitre, with the highest recorded being 600 nanograms per millilitre.

Nandrolone won a high profile in 1990 when the then world 400 metres record holder, Butch Reynolds, tested positive and received a two-year ban despite pleading innocence. Eight years later the Czech tennis player Petr Korda tested positive for nandrolone and received a ban, although he was later acquitted. In 2003 seven tennis players were cleared by the Association of Tennis Professionals, which admitted it may have given players contaminated supplements.

Also in 2003, Greg Rusedski was cleared of a positive test for nandrolone using the same line of defence. In the world of doping, it seems, nothing is simple.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in