Television deal at risk as players demand more say
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Players yesterday demanded a greater voice – or indeed any voice – in the running of cricket. They did not add to that claim the phrase "or else" but their mood was clear. This time they mean it.
The effect on the $550m (£350m) deal that the International Cricket Council has reached with the Global Cricket Corporation for television and marketing rights could be monumental. It is one of the most lucrative contracts in sporting history and if any one of its terms are not met GCC, part of the Murdoch empire, would seek to renegotiate or withdraw.
The players know they must tread a delicate line.
The Federation of International Cricket Associations (FICA) issued a statement after a meeting of most of the players involved in the Champions' Trophy. The nature of the tournament, which puts all the teams in one hotel for a fortnight, made such a gathering possible, which is probably not what the International Cricket Council had in mind when it organised it.
FICA now claims to represent player associations round the world, including India, which is in the process of forming one. It says the ICC has no right to try to stipulate who should represent the players.
FICA wants quick answers on the recent row over sponsorship which threatened the Champions' Trophy and wants an assurance that the ICC will agree to negotiate and consult with representatives of the players' own choosing.
The ICC had no comment yesterday. It knows it will have to allow players significant influence in running the game. It was one of the key recommendations of the report by Lord Condon's Anti-Corruption Unit.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments