Paul Downton sacking fallout: England coach Peter Moores faces sack regardless of results in West Indies

He might have gone already had Yorkshire's Jason Gillespie wanted the job now

Tom Collomosse
Friday 10 April 2015 01:17 EDT
Comments
Peter Moores faces the sack as England coach
Peter Moores faces the sack as England coach (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Peter Moores faces the sack as England coach regardless of how the team perform on their tour of the West Indies.

Paul Downton’s dismissal has left Moores, the man he appointed, in a vulnerable position as England prepare for a three-match Test series that starts in Antigua on Monday.

Following the removal of Downton, head selector James Whitaker is thought to be on extremely thin ice, along with fellow panel members Angus Fraser and Mick Newell. Ahead of the England and Wales Cricket Board meeting at Lord’s, the decision to fire Downton is believed to have been unopposed.

Chairman-elect Colin Graves officially takes the reins on 15 May but his influence, along with that of new chief executive Tom Harrison, is already being felt in the corridors of power.

There has been confusion at the heart of the ECB since Graves suggested early last month there might be a way back for exiled batsman Kevin Pietersen. Even when it became clear that Downton was in trouble, ECB officials were briefing that he retained the full confidence of the incoming regime. Clearly, that was not the case.

Yorkshire’s coach, Jason Gillespie, is a possible for the England job in the long term, but not before the Ashes
Yorkshire’s coach, Jason Gillespie, is a possible for the England job in the long term, but not before the Ashes (Getty Images)

Downton has paid the price for England’s dismal performance at the World Cup and Moores may yet suffer the same fate, too.

Moores might have gone already had Jason Gillespie, the Yorkshire coach who has an excellent relationship with Graves, wanted the job now. Yet the Australian, who led Yorkshire to the County Championship last summer after Graves appointed him in 2011, has publicly been lukewarm about taking on the England role.

Gillespie’s current plan is to stay at Yorkshire and coach Adelaide Strikers in the Big Bash, Australia’s Twenty20 tournament, this winter. The 39-year-old might also wonder about the wisdom of taking the England job now, ahead of a summer in which they face tough series against New Zealand and Australia.

Last month, Moores held a constructive meeting with Harrison but he remains under pressure.

While Graves and Harrison would face little opposition if they dispensed with the selectors, some at board level believe it might not be necessary to replace Downton. The statement confirming Downton’s departure also revealed the ECB plan to hire a “director of England cricket” - as opposed to the “managing director of England cricket” post that Downton held. The new role, for which former captains Michael Vaughan and Andrew Strauss are in the frame, will have “a clear focus on delivering a world-class performance environment for all formats”.

Yet there are those on the board who feel that simply hiring another man in a blazer will do little to solve England’s problems. It is a classic reflex of English cricket: when in doubt, give another job to a suit. While Vaughan or Strauss would have more credibility than Downton, adding another layer of management between the team and the board might further muddy the waters.

Pietersen, meanwhile, waits in the background. Downton’s dismissal removes an obstacle to his return and he will know that with no Downton, and probably no Whitaker before long, his chances of playing for England again look far rosier.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in