Lunch Report: New Zealand 260-8 (82 overs) v England

Lunch on the second day of the first Test (England won toss)

Stephen Brenkley
Friday 16 May 2008 08:16 EDT
Comments
(GETTY IMAGES)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It is usually supposed that if you win the toss and insert the opposition in a Test match you should bowl them out for 250. Any more than 280 and you have either bowled badly or the captain made the wrong decision.

By this pretty unscientific but nonetheless truthful yardstick, it could be concluded that Michael Vaughan was neither right nor wrong in asking New Zealand to bat. On a morning which was dull in every sense, the tourists added 52 runs for the loss of two wickets in 29 overs.

They had clearly concluded that the attacking policy which they favoured on the opening day was no longer to be trusted and became vigilant to the point of strokelessness. England abetted this plan by tending to bowl too short.

Both wickets fell to the new hero, Ryan Sidebottom, wicketless on the opening day, accounting first for the stubborn Jacob Oram, and then immediately with the second new ball bowling Kyle Mills with one that swung late. That over was remarkable: Sidebottom took one wicket and had close appeals turned down to four of its other balls.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in