Lunch report: England 341 for 8 (120 overs) v New Zealand

Stephen Brenkley
Friday 06 June 2008 08:44 EDT
Comments
(GETTY IMAGES)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

How most of England’s batsmen found matters so troublesome was made to seem still more bizarre this morning as two of their fast bowlers dealt comfortably with New Zealand’s increasingly irritated attack.

Stuart Broad and nightwatchman James Anderson put on 76 for the eighth wicket and although Broad was put down at slip (by Brendon McCullum who would have been keeping wicket had it not been for his sore back) early in the day they progressed smoothly. Broad indeed played with some élan and began to enhance his credentials as an all-rounder.

They were eventually parted when Anderson got a faint nick behind to Jacob Oram but by then England had built a commanding position on a pitch not entirely in favour of batsmen. New Zealand’s bowling lacked vigour and direction, although Chris Martin, who had an indifferent first day, could consider himself unfortunate.

Both Anderson and Broad made their highest Test scores with Broad having been a tantalising one run short of a maiden half century for 22 balls.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in