Hussain's place 'divided' the tour selectors

Stephen Brenkley
Saturday 10 January 2004 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

England's selectors were seriously considering dropping Nasser Hussain when they postponed the announcement of their touring party to the West Indies last week.

The former captain's place in the 16-man squad was strongly contested in the telephone discussions between the four-man panel. He came within a whisker of being replaced by the Middlesex batsman Andrew Strauss. Although the need to check on injuries to bowlers was given as the main reason for the embarrassing 24-hour delay in naming the squad, the conjecture about Hussain's form and durability is believed to have provoked heated debate.

The team coach, Duncan Fletcher, had publicly backed Hussain after the batsman's poor tour of Sri Lanka last month, when he averaged 11.5 in his two matches. The chairman of selectors, David Graveney, confirmed only that all the middle-order batting positions had been discussed.

"If the debate was robust then that is nothing new," he said. "That's what we're there for." The discussion not only casts doubt over Hussain's future but points to divisions on the panel between the need to plan a strategy for the future and the desirability of trying to win the next match.

Hussain was always likely to be under pressure to retain his place once he resigned the captaincy last July, but he scored a stirring century in his second match afterwards and was awarded one of only eight central contracts, worth around £125,000.

The squad are already suffering from premature disruption because, although the Glamorgan fast bowler Simon Jones has been picked after 14 months out, his place is subject to him proving his fitness on the Academy's tour of India.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in