Former Aussie PM Howard rejected for ICC vice-presidency

Greg Stutchbury
Wednesday 30 June 2010 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Former Australian Prime Minister John Howard has failed in his attempt to become the next vice-president of the International Cricket Council. The 70-year-old had been nominated by Cricket Australia and New Zealand Cricket, who have been asked to put forward another candidate. The decision was made yesterday at the ICC executive board meeting in Singapore.

"Following lengthy consideration it was recognised that the nomination did not have sufficient support. No vote was taken," the sport's governing body said in a statement. "Under the ICC's regional rotation process... Cricket Australia and New Zealand Cricket were invited to renominate a candidate by 31 August."

Under ICC rules, the vice-president would serve for two years then become president in 2012. CA and NZC issued a joint statement after the announcement expressing their disappointment. "Mr Howard possesses significant leadership and administrative skills," CA chairman Jack Clarke and NZC chairman Alan Isaac said. "We are deeply disappointed."

It is thought that only Australia, New Zealand and England had supported Howard. One of the reasons for his unpopularity was his criticism of Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe's regime when he was Australian Prime Minister.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in