English players start push for IPL green light

Stephen Brenkley
Thursday 28 February 2008 20:00 EST
Comments
(GETTY IMAGES)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

By the end of today, England may be starting to wish that they had never invented Twenty20. The jazzy short form of cricket may have revolutionised the world game – not to mention single-handedly saving the county circuit – but the huge sums of money being thrown at it are now threatening to cause huge ructions in the land of its birth.

The England and Wales Cricket Board and the Professional Cricketers' Association, the cricketers' trade union, will meet today. The sole item up for discussion is Twenty20 and who can play where and when, and the only point on which there is likely to be common accord is that it has been too successful.

If English players are not now allowed to follow the huge amounts of dollars on offer elsewhere on the globe, there is the immediate potential for contract disputes and arguments about restraint of trade. Players are set to resist any moves to curtail their freedom to play where they wish.

Lalit Modi, commissioner of the officially sanctioned Indian Premier League, offered a hint of the acrimony to come yesterday when he told the BBC: "Most of the English players say they'd like to play. We have a huge amount of pressure from the English players to be participating in it."

There is an important distinction between English players and England players. The latter may be centrally contracted and thus legitimately barred by the ECB from playing in the IPL, where salaries of between £75,000 and £750,000 for the six weeks the competition lasts were offered at the player auction in Mumbai last week.

Some English players have been approached by the eight franchises to take part in this year's tournament, which begins on 18 April. They would need permission from their counties but, such are the rewards, they are likely to seek it forcefully – as the PCA knows.

But the IPL will not be the only focus of discussion. There is also the so-called rebel Indian Cricket League, which is deemed to be unauthorised because, unlike its rival, it does not have the approval of the International Cricket Council.

The ICL was formed by Zee TV solely because it had been blocked in its bid to show India's international matches. It was instantly declared as unwanted by the Board of Control for Cricket in India, who retaliated by setting up the IPL and ensuring that millions of dollars were invested in the competition.

Earlier this week the ECB reiterated its veiled warning to players and umpires of the likely consequences of taking part in the ICL.

But that still leaves the officially backed IPL, which has signed most of the world's leading cricketers. Money is likely to end up doing the talking.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in