ECB seek Mohammed Amir explanation

Pa
Friday 10 June 2011 09:49 EDT
Comments
Amir was suspended for five years by the International Cricket Council in February after being found guilty of deliberately bowling no balls in the spot-fixing scandal against England
Amir was suspended for five years by the International Cricket Council in February after being found guilty of deliberately bowling no balls in the spot-fixing scandal against England (GETTY IMAGES)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The England and Wales Cricket Board have asked the Surrey Cricket Board to assist with their investigation into banned Pakistan bowler Mohammed Amir's appearance for a village side.

The 19-year-old paceman was suspended for five years by the International Cricket Council in February after being found guilty of deliberately bowling no balls in the spot-fixing scandal against England last year.

His ban states Amir must not take part in any cricket-related activity but he confirmed on Wednesday that he had played for Addington 1743 on Saturday in the Surrey Cricket League, with the club website stating that he took four wickets in seven overs and made 60 runs against St Luke's

Amir insisted that he had checked with the club if the match fell under the auspices of the ECB, but was told that it was a friendly.

He told PakPassion.net: "I was informed by club representatives before the game that it was a friendly match, being played on a privately-owned cricket ground.

"I asked the club representatives if the match fell under the jurisdiction of the ECB and they informed me that the match did not.

"I spoke to several club representatives about the issue and they all told me that it was a friendly match and therefore would not contravene my ban from the ICC. I was informed that I was fine to play."

The ICC immediately launched an investigation into the reports with the ECB following suit, and the latter have now asked the Surrey Cricket Board to help them look into the matter.

An ECB statement said: "The ECB today announced that it has requested the Surrey Cricket Board to assist it in its investigation of the circumstances surrounding the Pakistan cricketer Mohammed Amir's appearance for Addington 1743 CC in a Surrey Cricket League Division One match last weekend.

"ECB has also written separately to Addington 1743 CC seeking a full written explanation from the club of the events leading up to Amir's appearance in the match.

"The decision came after ECB confirmed Addington 1743 CC falls under its regulatory jurisdiction by virtue of the club being affiliated to the Surrey Cricket Board. The ECB will also continue to assist the ICC with its own inquiry into the matter."

Pakistan captain Salman Butt and seamer Mohammad Asif were banned along with Amir over the spot-fixing scandal, receiving bans of 10 and seven years respectively.

The trio, along with a fourth man Mazhar Majeed, are due to face trial at Southwark Crown Court in October accused of cheating and conspiracy to obtain and accept corrupt payments. They deny the charges.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in